What if both parties just want power and are willing to have young people fight meaningless wars in order to enhance that power? What if both parties continue to fight the war on drugs just to give bureaucrats and cops bigger budgets and more jobs?
What if government policies didn't change when government's leaders did? What if no matter who won an election, government stayed the same? What if government was really a revolving door of political hacks, bent on exploiting the people while they're in charge?
What if both parties supported welfare, war, debt, bailouts and big government? What if the rhetoric that candidates displayed on the campaign trail was dumped after electoral victory?
Which of the Republican candidates will stand for freedom and oppose big government after the election? Who? If you did not not say Ron Paul, you should reconsider the questions posed by Andrew Napolitano.
Mitt Romney, my former governor. Face it, Ron Paul doesn't have a shot in hell of winning the nomination. Keep voting on "principle" and Obama will be reelected! Romney did a great job as governor of Mass., especially with an 85% Democrat legislature. We've had enough career politicians and especially lawyer/politicians; it's time for an experienced businessperson to go to DC and kick some bureaucratic ass! ROMNEY will do it! I watched him do it as my governor. First and foremost Romney is a fiscal conservative. If we don't get our "fiscal house" in order, we won't have to worry about anything else.
ReplyDeleteHaHa! Great April Fool's retort. Seriously, voters are not ready to elect a candidate who offers freedom and personal responsibility and a laissez-faire approach to governmental policy so they'll have to choose between the lesser of two evils again.
Delete